Ukraine’s Accession to the European Union: A Catalyst for Strategic Enhancement and Renewed Dynamism

Photo by Sascha Hormel: https://www.pexels.com/photo/shallow-focus-photography-of-black-ship-1095814/

I. Introduction: A Transformative Enlargement – Ukraine’s Journey to the EU and its Strategic Significance

A. The Geopolitical Imperative and Renewed Momentum for Enlargement

The trajectory of Ukraine’s relationship with the European Union underwent a dramatic acceleration following Russia’s full-scale invasion in February 2022.¹ This act of aggression fundamentally reshaped the EU’s approach to enlargement, transforming it from a largely technocratic process into a pressing geopolitical necessity.³ The war propelled Ukraine from a country on the EU’s periphery to a nation pivotal to the bloc’s future security architecture and its very identity.² In an unprecedented display of resolve and strategic reorientation, the EU moved swiftly, granting Ukraine candidate status in June 2022 and formally opening accession negotiations in June 2024.² This marked a significant departure from previous enlargement rounds, signaling a profound policy shift driven by the stark realities of a new security landscape in Europe.

Russia’s aggression against Ukraine was not merely a territorial dispute; it represented an assault on the foundational values upon which the EU was built – democracy, sovereignty, and the rule of law.² This context imbued Ukraine’s EU aspirations with a new urgency. The invasion served as a brutal end to what some termed the “post-modern, post-geopolitical period of European security,” compelling the EU to confront the consequences of its prior neglect of hard security concerns in its wider neighborhood.² Consequently, Ukraine’s bid for membership is increasingly viewed not just as an aspiration of Kyiv, but as a strategic imperative for the EU itself. The EU’s previous approach, which often relegated relations with Ukraine to a “low-politics, low-risk substitute for membership” focusing on market access and functional integration, proved insufficient in the face of overt military aggression.² The war has underscored the idea that enlargement, particularly to Ukraine, is now a “defensive strategy” ³ and a “geopolitical imperative” ⁶ for the Union. Integrating Ukraine is seen as crucial for bolstering the EU’s eastern flank and enhancing its capacity to counter Russian influence and future aggression.⁷ This reframing of enlargement underscores a critical understanding: the value Ukraine brings is intrinsically linked to the EU’s own security, resilience, and its ambition to be a more assertive geopolitical actor in an increasingly contested world. The accelerated timeline, therefore, is not an isolated event concerning one candidate country; it reflects a fundamental adaptation of the EU’s core foreign policy tools to a new, more dangerous geopolitical reality. This may, in turn, necessitate a re-evaluation of the traditional balance between merit-based accession criteria and overarching geopolitical considerations, as well as a serious look at the EU’s own institutional capacity to absorb a large, war-afflicted nation.⁶

B. Thesis Statement

Ukraine’s accession to the European Union, while undoubtedly presenting significant challenges related to reconstruction and institutional reform, offers the EU a unique and transformative opportunity. By integrating Ukraine, the EU stands to significantly enhance its strategic autonomy, bolster its economic resilience and competitiveness, expand its global influence, and reinforce its foundational democratic values. Ultimately, Ukraine’s membership can act as a catalyst for a stronger, more dynamic, and geopolitically assertive European Union.

II. Bolstering the EU’s Economic Landscape: Ukraine’s Contributions to Growth and Competitiveness

A. Agricultural Powerhouse: Enhancing EU Food Security and Global Market Leadership

Ukraine’s agricultural sector represents a formidable asset that can significantly contribute to the European Union’s food security and global market standing. Recognized as a global agricultural giant, Ukraine possesses arable land comparable in size to Italy and ranks among the world’s leading grain exporters.⁹ Specifically, it is the world’s largest exporter of sunflower oil, the third-largest exporter of barley, the fourth-largest of maize, and the fifth-largest of wheat.⁹ The integration of this productive capacity into the EU’s single market promises to reduce the Union’s dependence on agricultural imports from other regions and substantially strengthen its overall food security, a consideration of increasing importance in a world marked by supply chain vulnerabilities and geopolitical uncertainties.⁹

Concerns have been voiced within the EU, particularly among agricultural communities, regarding the potential impact of Ukraine’s accession on the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). The CAP constitutes one of the EU’s largest expenditure areas, and there are apprehensions that Ukraine, as a major agricultural producer, could become a substantial beneficiary, thereby diverting funds from existing member states.⁹ However, several mitigating factors and strategic approaches can address these concerns. The implementation of transitional periods, similar to those applied during Spain’s accession in 1986, could limit Ukrainian farmers’ immediate access to full CAP subsidies, allowing for a gradual adjustment to EU standards and reducing immediate budgetary strains.⁹ Furthermore, the EU could introduce capped payments, limiting the share of CAP funds that any single member state or individual farm receives—a measure already under discussion within the European Commission.⁹ It is also plausible that many large Ukrainian agro-holdings might not qualify for the full spectrum of CAP subsidies due to existing rules that cap direct payments to large farms. Moreover, a significant portion of Ukraine’s agricultural sector is already competitive and may not require extensive subsidies to thrive.⁹ Importantly, the process of aligning with EU single market standards in areas such as food safety, water quality, and pesticide use will likely increase production costs for Ukrainian farmers, thereby leveling the playing field and reducing risks of unfair competition.⁹

Beyond mitigating challenges, Ukraine’s agricultural integration offers distinct opportunities. The sheer scale of Ukraine’s agricultural output could be the catalyst for long-overdue, efficiency-driven reforms of the CAP. The CAP currently accounts for approximately 32% of the EU’s 2021-2027 budget.⁹ Integrating a producer of Ukraine’s magnitude under the existing rules would undoubtedly exert considerable pressure on this budget. This pressure, however, could compel member states to agree on more targeted and economically rational subsidy mechanisms, such as payment capping or enhanced support for environmental sustainability.⁹ Such reforms would not only accommodate Ukraine but could lead to a more sustainable and efficient CAP for the entire Union, aligning with broader EU objectives like the Green Deal. As noted, Ukraine’s membership “might also provide the right impetus to move ahead with necessary CAP reforms”.⁹

Furthermore, the integration of Ukraine’s agricultural prowess can significantly enhance the EU’s geopolitical leverage in global food markets. Ukraine is a crucial food supplier to many countries in the Global South.¹⁰ An EU augmented by Ukraine’s agricultural capacity would become an even more dominant force in global agricultural exports.¹⁰ This enhanced market power could translate into greater “political leadership,” enabling the EU to play a more significant role in addressing global food security crises and potentially diminishing the influence of actors like Russia in key markets, for instance, in Africa.¹⁰ This effectively transforms agricultural policy into a potent tool of foreign policy and soft power, bolstering the EU’s international standing.

Additionally, Ukraine’s current agricultural practices, which involve significantly lower average use of pesticides and mineral fertilizers compared to the EU average ¹⁰, present an opportunity for the EU to champion and expand greener farming practices. This aligns with the EU’s ambitions for a more sustainable agricultural sector. However, this also presents the challenge of ensuring that Ukrainian agriculture can meet the EU’s stringent environmental and food safety standards without undermining its competitiveness. This transition will necessitate substantial support from the EU, including investment in Ukrainian agricultural research, development, and infrastructure, potentially creating a model for sustainable agricultural development that could be emulated elsewhere.⁹

B. Human Capital and Innovation Engine: Fueling EU’s Digital and Economic Future

Ukraine possesses a highly skilled and educated workforce that stands as a significant asset for an aging European Union facing demographic challenges and labor shortages. A striking 58% of Ukrainians aged 30-34 have completed tertiary education, a figure considerably higher than the EU average of 40%.⁹ This educated populace is particularly strong in strategic sectors such as healthcare, construction, and, most notably, technology.⁹

The Ukrainian IT sector, in particular, has demonstrated remarkable resilience and dynamism, emerging as a strategic global player even amidst the challenges of war.¹¹ In 2024, the sector’s exports reached 147 countries, and it contributed 3.4% to Ukraine’s GDP, underscoring its economic significance.¹² This vibrant ecosystem is home to a large pool of tech specialists, with non-formal IT education pathways, such as boot camps and corporate academies, training four times more talent than traditional state institutions, highlighting the adaptability and market-responsiveness of its human capital development.¹²

Ukraine’s advancements in e-governance, epitomized by the Diia super app, offer a compelling model for digital transformation across the EU. Diia serves over 22 million users—more than half of Ukraine’s population—and has propelled the country from 102nd position in 2018 to 5th in 2024 in the UN E-Government Development Index (EGDI) for digital services.¹¹ The Diia ecosystem is comprehensive, offering digital documents, signatures, and a multitude of essential services for citizens (e.g., eRecovery for housing aid, eMarriage), businesses (Diia.Business for entrepreneurial support), and education (Diia.Education for digital literacy), and even includes Diia.Engine, an open-source tool for rapid digital service development.¹¹ This track record of innovation and implementation can provide valuable insights and practical solutions for the EU’s own digital agenda.

This deep well of human capital and innovative capacity can play a crucial role in addressing labor shortages within the EU, particularly in high-demand fields like technology and the broader digital economy.⁹ The table below offers a snapshot of Ukraine’s strengths in this domain.

Metric	Ukraine	EU Average / Context	Source(s)
Tertiary Education (30-34 age group)	58%	40%	9
IT Sector Contribution to GDP (2024)	3.4%	Significant, surpassed only by agriculture in Ukraine	12
IT Exports (Countries Reached)	147	Global reach	12
Diia App Users	>22 million	Over half of Ukraine’s population	11
UN EGDI Ranking (Digital Services)	5th (2024)	Rose from 102nd (2018)	11
Non-formal vs. Formal IT Graduates (Ratio)	~4:1 (821,300 non-formal vs. 180,400 formal, 2019-2024)	Demonstrates industry adaptability	12

Table 1: Ukraine’s Human Capital & Digital Prowess

The experience of Ukraine in achieving rapid digital transformation under extreme duress, such as the expansion of Diia’s functionalities during wartime to include services like eAssistance for displaced citizens and eVorog for reporting enemy movements ¹¹, offers more than just skilled personnel. It provides the EU with invaluable lessons and proven, battle-tested solutions for enhancing its own digital resilience and public service delivery. The Diia platform itself has been made open-source, offering a tangible asset for other governments.¹¹ This is not merely a transfer of labor but a transfer of “know-how” in agile innovation and crisis management within the digital sphere, directly relevant to the EU’s ambitions for a robust digital single market and resilient e-government infrastructures.¹⁵

The influx of Ukrainian human capital, if managed effectively with appropriate transitional measures, has the potential to do more than just fill existing labor gaps. It can inject a significant degree of dynamism and entrepreneurial spirit into EU economies. The robust growth of Ukraine’s IT sector, fueled by a young, highly educated, and tech-savvy workforce, alongside the proliferation of non-formal education tailored to market needs, points to a strong entrepreneurial undercurrent.⁹ Many Ukrainians have already demonstrated their capacity to integrate into EU labor markets through the Temporary Protection Status.⁹ This suggests a potential for Ukrainians to become not only employees but also innovators and job creators within the Union, potentially fostering new industries and innovation clusters, especially if supported by initiatives analogous to Diia.Business or linked to existing EU frameworks for SME support.

However, the prospect of EU membership also brings the challenge of potential “brain drain” from Ukraine.¹⁶ While the EU stands to benefit from Ukrainian talent, a large-scale, permanent departure of skilled workers could impede Ukraine’s own post-war reconstruction and long-term development. The Ministry of Economics in Ukraine estimates that 4.5 million workers will be necessary for the reconstruction effort, and the country already faces difficulties filling vacancies.¹⁶ With a significant number of Ukrainians, particularly women and children, already residing abroad ¹⁶, a proactive approach is needed. This implies a shared responsibility for Ukraine and the EU to develop strategies that balance the benefits of labor mobility with Ukraine’s domestic requirements. Policies fostering “brain circulation”—encouraging temporary work, joint projects, and incentives for return—rather than a one-way “brain drain” will be crucial for ensuring that Ukraine can rebuild and that its human capital contributes sustainably to both its own future and that of the EU.

C. Industrial and Trade Synergies: Expanding the Single Market and Enhancing Resilience

Ukraine’s accession to the European Union is poised to significantly expand the EU’s single market, creating new avenues for trade, investment, and economic growth for businesses across the continent.⁴ Despite its potential, Ukraine’s share in total EU imports was a mere 1.7% in 2024, indicating substantial untapped capacity for deeper economic integration.¹⁸ The groundwork for this integration has been progressively laid through instruments like the EU-Ukraine Association Agreement, which includes a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), and more recently, the Autonomous Trade Measures (ATMs) implemented in response to the war.⁹ These measures have already borne fruit, with the EU’s share of Ukraine’s total exports surging from 24.9% in 2012 to over 56% by the end of 2023.¹⁸

The integration offers specific opportunities for supply chain cooperation. For instance, synergies can be developed between Ukrainian grain producers and European livestock farmers or food processing industries, enhancing the efficiency and resilience of EU agri-food value chains.¹⁰ Beyond goods, the full liberalization of trade in services is anticipated to yield considerable benefits, particularly for the EU, as it currently holds most of the reservations in this area.¹³ Ukraine’s main EU partners in services trade are already Germany and Poland, with trade expanding with other member states like Estonia.¹³

A key strategic advantage of integrating Ukraine lies in the opportunity for the EU to “onshore” or “friend-shore” critical industrial capacities and supply chains that are currently situated in regions perceived as less stable or geopolitically problematic. The EU has explicitly stated its aim to reinforce its strategic autonomy.¹⁸ Ukraine, with its substantial, albeit war-damaged, industrial base ⁹ and geographical proximity, offers a viable alternative. The extensive post-war reconstruction effort ²¹ will necessitate significant industrial rebuilding. This presents a window for the EU to co-invest in and integrate Ukrainian industries—ranging from manufacturing to the processing of raw materials—directly into European value chains. Such a strategy would not only aid Ukraine’s recovery but also reduce the EU’s dependence on distant or unreliable suppliers, thereby strengthening the overall resilience of the single market. This approach transcends simple trade facilitation, moving towards strategic industrial co-development.

Furthermore, the rigorous process of aligning Ukraine’s industrial and regulatory standards with the EU acquis communautaire will yield benefits for both sides. Ukrainian businesses have long demonstrated an orientation towards European standards and a predictable regulatory environment.¹⁸ The accession process mandates comprehensive alignment with the EU

acquis ⁹, which inherently reduces trade barriers, harmonizes standards, and mitigates investment risks. Consequently, the journey towards membership itself acts as an economic catalyst, systematically improving Ukraine’s investment climate and making it an increasingly attractive partner for EU businesses. This fosters a virtuous cycle of deeper integration, increased investment, and sustained economic growth, consistent with the notion that the EU should astutely use accession criteria to cultivate a better-functioning economy and robust public institutions in candidate countries.¹⁹

D. Access to Critical Raw Materials (CRMs): Fueling the Green and Digital Transitions

Ukraine possesses a wealth of critical raw materials (CRMs) that are vital for the European Union’s ambitious green and digital transitions, as well as for its defense sector. The country is estimated to hold 5% of the world’s total mineral resources ²⁴ and boasts significant deposits of 25 out of the 34 materials classified as critical by the EU.²³ Notably, Ukraine harbors the largest titanium reserves in Europe, one of the continent’s most extensive lithium reserves (estimated at approximately 500,000 tonnes), and around 20% of the world’s graphite.²³ Lithium and graphite are indispensable components for current electric vehicle battery technologies. Other significant mineral resources found in Ukraine include beryllium, manganese, gallium, uranium, zirconium, apatite, fluorite, cobalt, and nickel, all of which play crucial roles in sectors ranging from renewable energy generation and e-mobility to semiconductors and advanced defense systems.²³

The strategic importance of these CRMs for the EU cannot be overstated. Access to Ukrainian resources offers a pathway to reduce the Union’s heavy dependence on external suppliers, which are often concentrated in a few countries, including geopolitical rivals like China (currently supplying 98% of the EU’s rare earth element needs ²³).²³ This diversification is central to the EU’s pursuit of strategic autonomy and supply chain resilience. Recognizing this potential, the EU and Ukraine signed a strategic partnership on critical raw materials and battery value chains in July 2021, aiming to integrate these crucial sectors more closely.²³

However, realizing this potential is not without challenges. A significant portion of Ukraine’s mineral deposits is located in eastern and southern regions, areas currently contested or occupied by Russia.²³ Moreover, current assessments of Ukraine’s mineral wealth often rely on outdated Soviet-era geological surveys, which may not accurately reflect the economic viability of extraction.²³ Significant investment will be required to modernize Ukraine’s mining sector, develop processing and refining capabilities, and ensure that extraction meets EU environmental and social standards.²³

The table below summarizes some of Ukraine’s key CRM endowments and their relevance to the EU.

Critical Raw Material	Estimated Reserves/Significance in Ukraine	Ukraine’s Global/European Rank (if available)	Key EU Applications	Source(s)
Lithium	Approx. 500,000 tonnes; one of Europe’s largest reserves	Europe: #1 (reserves)	EV batteries, energy storage	23
Titanium	Europe’s largest reserves	Global: #9 (production pre-war 7%)	Aerospace, defense, industrial applications	23
Graphite	20% of world’s reserves	Global: Significant	EV batteries, lubricants, refractories	23
Beryllium	Significant deposits		Defense, telecommunications, aerospace	24
Manganese	Significant deposits; 140,000,000 t reserves	Global: #4 (reserves)	Steel production, batteries	24
Gallium	Significant deposits; Ukraine 2nd in gallium	Europe: Significant	Semiconductors, LEDs, electronics	23
Uranium	Significant deposits; Classified reserves	Europe: #1 (reserves)	Nuclear energy	24
Rare Earth Elements	Europe’s largest recoverable reserves (untapped)	Europe: #1 (recoverable reserves)	Electronics, magnets, renewable energy, defense	23
Cobalt	Significant deposits		Batteries, superalloys	24
Nickel	Significant deposits		Batteries, stainless steel	24

Table 2: Ukraine’s Key Critical Raw Material Reserves & EU Strategic Value

The development of Ukraine’s CRM sector, with substantial EU support and investment, could establish a new, resilient, and ethically sourced supply chain for the Union. This endeavor, however, necessitates a long-term strategy that intricately links reconstruction efforts with industrial policy, while carefully navigating the geopolitical risks associated with resource extraction in a post-conflict environment. It is not merely a matter of mining; it involves building entire value chains, including crucial processing and refining stages, either within Ukraine or in close collaboration with EU member states.²⁶ This implies a “Marshall Plan” style commitment for this sector, aligning it with Ukraine’s overall recovery and the EU’s broader industrial strategy, particularly the Critical Raw Materials Act.²³

Furthermore, the EU-Ukraine strategic partnership on CRMs, if leveraged effectively throughout the accession and reconstruction phases, could position Ukraine as more than just an extraction site. It could become a central node in the EU’s ambitions to build a circular economy for critical materials. By fostering processing, refining, and potentially recycling capacities within Ukraine ²⁶, the EU can support higher-value economic activities and promote more sustainable resource management. This would require significant technology transfer and investment in advanced processing facilities but would align perfectly with the EU’s long-term goals for resource security and environmental sustainability.

E. Energy Security Enhancement: Diversifying Supplies and Boosting Resilience

Ukraine offers substantial assets that can significantly enhance the European Union’s energy security, primarily through its vast natural gas storage capacity and its burgeoning potential in renewable energy sources. Ukraine possesses the third-largest natural gas storage capacity globally and the largest in Europe, estimated between 31 and 37 billion cubic meters (bcm).¹⁰ Critically, approximately 80% of this capacity is strategically located in western Ukraine, close to EU borders, minimizing transit costs and enhancing security.²⁷ These facilities, situated at depths of 400 meters to 2 kilometers, are considered well-protected from potential attacks.²⁷

This extensive storage infrastructure can be utilized by EU member states to stockpile natural gas, including Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) procured from global markets (e.g., the United States), thereby creating a buffer against supply disruptions and price volatility.¹⁰ This capability is particularly relevant following the cessation of the transit agreement for Russian gas via Ukraine and the EU’s broader efforts to diversify away from Russian energy.²⁷ European companies have already begun using Ukrainian storage, and there is potential to significantly increase this cooperation.²⁷

Beyond fossil fuels, Ukraine holds considerable potential in renewable energy. The country’s southern regions, with their unique climatic conditions, are particularly suited for solar and wind power generation.¹⁰ There is also significant, largely untapped potential in biomass, which could be used for biomethane and green hydrogen production.¹⁰ Studies estimate that agricultural waste alone could produce biogas equivalent to 2.6

bcm of natural gas annually, with potential to grow to 7.7 bcm.²⁹ While renewable energy accounted for roughly 13% of Ukraine’s energy production in 2022 ³⁰, there is enormous scope for expansion. Ukraine’s existing nuclear power infrastructure, which provided about 55% of its electricity pre-war ³⁰, and its electricity grid’s synchronization with the European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity (ENTSO-E) since March 2022, further contribute to regional energy stability.¹⁰ The EU has been actively supporting the resilience and efficiency of Ukraine’s energy sector, including through the Ukraine Energy Support Fund and initiatives to boost decentralized power production.³¹

The full integration and securing of Ukraine’s gas storage facilities could fundamentally transform the European gas market. By acting as a strategic reserve for the wider region, this capacity can mitigate price shocks and reduce the leverage of any single dominant supplier, thereby enhancing market stability and resilience.²⁷ This is more than just infrastructure; it’s a strategic tool for energy security.

Moreover, the development of Ukraine’s renewable energy potential, especially in green hydrogen and biomethane ¹⁰, as part of its post-war reconstruction, offers a significant opportunity for the EU to accelerate its own green transition and meet ambitious decarbonization targets. Ukraine could evolve into a key supplier of green energy to the EU, shifting its role from primarily a transit country for fossil fuels to a producer and exporter of clean energy.³³ This vision requires substantial investment, technology transfer, and the rebuilding of infrastructure with a “build back greener” philosophy ³², aligning with the EU’s long-term climate objectives and its quest for energy independence.

Finally, the deepening integration of Ukraine’s energy system with the EU’s—through grid synchronization, potential participation in common gas purchasing mechanisms ³¹, and the development of new interconnectors ¹⁰—not only bolsters Ukraine’s own energy security but also strengthens the overall stability and interoperability of the European energy network. A larger, more interconnected system is inherently more resilient to disruptions, better able to manage supply-demand fluctuations, and more effective at sharing resources during crises, thus enhancing collective energy security for the entire bloc.

III. Strengthening European Security and Geopolitical Standing

A. A Battle-Hardened Defense Contributor: Enhancing EU’s Collective Security

Ukraine’s potential accession to the European Union brings with it a military force of unparalleled contemporary experience in large-scale, high-intensity warfare. The Ukrainian Armed Forces represent the largest and most battle-tested military in Europe, possessing unique, up-to-date expertise in countering conventional and hybrid warfare tactics employed by a major state actor, Russia.³⁴ This experience, forged over years of conflict since 2014 and dramatically intensified since the 2022 full-scale invasion, is an invaluable asset for the EU’s collective security.

Beyond sheer experience, Ukraine has demonstrated remarkable innovation in defense technology and battlefield adaptation. This is particularly evident in its pioneering use of drone warfare, including First-Person View (FPV) drones for precision strikes, and advanced maritime drones like the ‘Sea Baby’ and ‘Magura V5’, which have successfully challenged Russian naval dominance in the Black Sea.⁸ Ukraine was the first nation to establish a dedicated branch of its armed forces for Unmanned Systems, underscoring its commitment to this transformative technology.³⁴ Furthermore, Ukrainian forces have shown proficiency in electronic countermeasures and have developed agile command and control systems, such as the DELTA platform, which has received recognition from NATO experts.³⁴

Ukraine is also actively developing its domestic defense industrial base (DTIB). Currently, approximately 40% of its military equipment is produced domestically, with significant potential for future growth and integration with the European defense technological and industrial base (EDTIB).³⁴ This indigenous capacity, coupled with its innovative drive, can contribute to strengthening Europe’s overall defense production capabilities.

Crucially, Ukraine offers invaluable intelligence on Russian military doctrine, operational tactics, strategic thinking, and its evolving relationships with other authoritarian powers.³⁴ This first-hand knowledge is critical for the EU to develop effective countermeasures and anticipate future threats. European nations are already seeking to learn from Ukraine’s battlefield innovations; for example, Denmark has planned to send military personnel to Ukraine to study its advancements in drone warfare, and the United Kingdom’s development of the StormShroud autonomous drone has been influenced by lessons from the Ukrainian conflict.³⁶

The table below outlines key defense contributions Ukraine can offer.

Contribution Area	Specifics	Source(s)
Military Strength	Largest battle-tested army in Europe; extensive experience in high-intensity conventional/hybrid warfare	34
Defense Innovations	Advanced drone warfare (FPV, Sea Baby, Magura V5), electronic warfare, DELTA C2 system, agile adaptation	34
Intelligence Value	Deep insights into Russian military tactics, strategy, hybrid warfare, and alliances	34
DTIB Capacity	~40% domestic production, growing innovation, potential for integration with EDTIB	34
Unmanned Systems Force	World’s first dedicated military branch for unmanned systems	34

Table 3: Ukraine’s Defense Contributions to EU Security

The accession of Ukraine would therefore represent more than a simple quantitative addition to the EU’s collective defense capabilities. It would integrate a military force with unique, current, and extensive experience in modern, high-intensity warfare against a peer adversary—experience that most EU militaries currently lack.³⁴ This practical, hard-won knowledge can fundamentally enhance EU military training, doctrine development, procurement strategies, and interoperability, thereby making European defense efforts more effective and bolstering the credibility of its deterrence posture. As observed, Ukraine’s army is “the only European army that has it, especially for the kind of war that involves Russia”.³⁶

Integrating Ukraine’s rapidly innovating defense-tech sector also presents an opportunity to spur the development of a more agile and responsive European defense industrial base. Ukraine’s defense technology innovates at a remarkable pace, often moving “from blueprint to battlefield” with great speed to seize tactical advantages.³⁶ The EU aims to strengthen its own EDTIB and promote joint procurement initiatives.³⁷ Joint ventures between EU and Ukrainian defense companies, alongside EU investment in Ukrainian production capacity ³⁶, can lead to the co-development of new technologies, foster faster production cycles, and contribute to a more resilient EDTIB, better equipped to meet Europe’s rearmament needs and address critical capability gaps identified from the ongoing conflict.³⁸

Furthermore, the intelligence and profound understanding that Ukraine possesses regarding Russian hybrid warfare tactics—including disinformation campaigns, cyber warfare, and interference operations ³⁴—are critical assets for the EU. Sharing this expertise can significantly improve the Union’s ability to detect, deter, and counter such multifaceted threats across all member states, thereby strengthening not only military defense but also broader democratic and societal resilience against malign influence.

B. Geopolitical Realignment: Enhancing the EU’s Global Role and Countering Adversaries

Ukraine’s membership in the European Union would represent a significant geopolitical realignment, substantially enhancing the EU’s stature as a global actor and fortifying its capacity to counter adversarial influences. The integration of Ukraine, a large and strategically vital nation, would solidify the EU’s eastern flank, serving as a powerful deterrent against further Russian expansionism and revisionist ambitions in Eastern Europe.⁶ This bolstering of the EU’s frontier is a direct contribution to the security and stability of the entire continent.

Beyond its immediate neighborhood, Ukraine’s accession is poised to augment the EU’s overall geopolitical weight and influence on the world stage.⁶ As highlighted by analysis, expanding the EU’s territory, economy, population, and defense industrial base through Ukraine’s membership inherently enhances its capacity to act cohesively and assertively in international affairs.⁷ This increased heft can enable the EU to project its interests and values more effectively in a multipolar world. For instance, the combined agricultural export power of an EU including Ukraine could significantly increase the Union’s political and economic influence in the Global South, providing an alternative partnership model and countering the narratives of other global powers.¹⁰

The very act of enlargement to include a country of Ukraine’s significance, particularly in the context of an ongoing war waged against its European aspirations, is a potent geopolitical statement. It underscores the enduring attractiveness of the European project and the EU’s unwavering commitment to fostering a stable, democratic, and rules-based order on the continent.² This can serve to inspire democratic movements and reforms in other countries within the EU’s neighborhood and beyond.

Ukraine’s membership is likely to trigger a fundamental recalibration of the EU’s internal political dynamics and its overarching foreign policy orientation. The accession of a large nation with acute security concerns regarding Russia will inevitably bring these issues to the forefront of EU policy debates.² Eastern European member states, which have historically adopted a more cautious stance towards Russia, would find a powerful and experienced ally in Ukraine. This could catalyze a shift towards a more assertive, unified, and security-focused EU foreign policy, particularly concerning Russia and other authoritarian regimes. While this could also introduce new internal tensions if not managed astutely ⁶, it has the potential to move the EU’s center of gravity eastward on security matters, possibly reducing the traditional dominance of the Franco-German axis in shaping policy towards the region.²

Moreover, a successfully integrated Ukraine within the EU can serve as a compelling model of democratic resilience and socio-economic transformation for other countries in the Eastern Neighbourhood and potentially further afield. Ukraine made a definitive choice for a European path despite immense external pressure and the devastation of war.⁴² Its successful integration, demonstrating the tangible benefits of democratic reforms and alignment with EU standards, can inspire similar aspirations in nations like Moldova and Georgia, and perhaps even influence internal dynamics in countries currently under authoritarian rule. This would significantly bolster the EU’s normative power and its ability to promote democracy, stability, and prosperity in its wider periphery, offering a credible alternative to authoritarian models of governance.

Finally, the EU’s steadfast commitment to Ukraine’s accession, despite the inherent complexities and costs, signals a long-term investment in European stability that has broader implications for transatlantic relations. This strategic undertaking could reduce the security burden on the United States in Europe over time.⁷ A stronger, more stable, and defensively capable Europe, with Ukraine as an integrated member, is less likely to require extensive U.S. military presence and intervention on the continent.⁷ This, in turn, could allow the United States to reallocate resources and strategic focus to other global priorities, such as the Indo-Pacific region.⁷ Thus, Ukraine’s EU path is not merely a regional European issue; it contributes to a more balanced and sustainable global security architecture and has positive ramifications for transatlantic burden-sharing.

C. Reinforcing the EU’s Eastern Flank and Overall Resilience

The integration of Ukraine into the European Union is paramount for reinforcing the security of the EU’s eastern flank and enhancing the overall resilience of the continent. A stable, democratic, and prosperous Ukraine, firmly anchored within the EU, serves as the most effective bulwark against potential threats from the east and is a fundamental guarantee for the long-term security of EU member states in the region.⁶ The process of integrating Ukraine inherently compels the EU to become more cohesive and proactive in its own defense and foreign policy posture, particularly concerning its eastern neighborhood.⁶

Beyond hard security, Ukraine’s demonstrated societal resilience in the face of protracted, large-scale aggression offers a rich source of inspiration and practical lessons for the EU as it seeks to bolster its own preparedness against a wide spectrum of threats, including hybrid warfare, disinformation, and critical infrastructure attacks.³⁴ The adaptability of Ukrainian institutions, the mobilization of its civil society, and the steadfastness of its populace under extreme duress provide valuable insights into building national and collective resilience.

The imperative to integrate Ukraine will likely catalyze more significant EU investment in cross-border infrastructure—spanning transport, energy, and digital networks—connecting the Union with its eastern neighborhood. While primarily aimed at supporting Ukraine’s reconstruction and facilitating its integration into the single market ¹⁰, these investments will concurrently enhance the economic dynamism, connectivity, and resilience of the EU’s own eastern regions. The EU’s Connecting Europe Facility, which Ukraine can now access ³¹, alongside the massive infrastructure upgrades required for Ukraine’s recovery ²¹, will naturally draw development and economic activity towards the EU’s eastern frontier. This can help reduce regional disparities within the EU and forge new economic corridors that are mutually beneficial for Ukraine and existing eastern member states, strengthening the fabric of the Union.

Furthermore, the unprecedented challenge of integrating a country actively recovering from large-scale conflict, with millions of displaced citizens and extensive reconstruction needs ⁹, will inevitably force the EU to develop more robust, flexible, and innovative mechanisms for crisis response, reconstruction aid management, and social integration. Existing EU instruments, such as cohesion funds and the Temporary Protection Status framework ⁶, will be tested and will likely require adaptation to meet the unique scale and nature of Ukraine’s situation. This crucible of necessity will drive innovation in EU policymaking related to post-conflict recovery, refugee integration strategies, and financial assistance delivery. The lessons learned and the institutional capacities developed through this process will equip the EU with more resilient and adaptable tools, enhancing its ability to respond effectively to future crises, manage other complex enlargements, or support stabilization efforts in other volatile regions.

IV. Enriching the European Project: Societal and Cultural Dimensions

A. Shared Values and European Identity: A Reaffirmation of Core Principles

Ukraine’s journey towards EU membership is deeply rooted in a societal embrace of European values, a commitment that has been unequivocally demonstrated since the Revolution of Dignity in 2014 and profoundly intensified by the ongoing war against Russian aggression.² Research indicates a strong identification with European identity among Ukrainians, with one study finding that 81% of Ukrainian refugees surveyed felt either totally or partially European.⁴² This sentiment is underpinned by a growing alignment with core EU principles such as democracy, the rule of law, respect for human rights, social justice, and freedom.⁴² President Zelenskyy himself has affirmed that Ukrainians are defending not only their own country but also the values of Europe.⁴³

The remarkable resilience and vibrant activism of Ukrainian civil society in defending these democratic values, organizing grassroots support, and resisting authoritarianism can serve as a source of inspiration and invigoration for the EU’s own democratic fabric.⁴⁵ While studies acknowledge that some value differences may persist, particularly among older generations, there is a clear trend showing younger Ukrainian cohorts increasingly shifting towards EU-aligned values.⁴³ The very act of Ukraine seeking and progressing towards EU membership, in the face of such adversity, is a powerful testament to the enduring appeal and transformative power of the European project itself.²

The accession of Ukraine, a nation that has made immense sacrifices in defense of democratic principles against an authoritarian aggressor, could provide a significant reinvigoration of the EU’s own commitment to these foundational values. At a time when some existing member states are facing challenges related to democratic backsliding and the rule of law ⁶, welcoming a country so profoundly committed to these ideals could serve as a powerful internal catalyst. The Ukrainian experience, where values like democracy and human rights are not abstract concepts but existential necessities ⁴², can offer a fresh perspective and renewed impetus for the EU to uphold and strengthen its own democratic standards, potentially creating a “renewal effect” across the Union.

Furthermore, Ukraine possesses a rich, ancient, and distinct cultural heritage that, once fully integrated, will add new layers to the diversity and vibrancy of Europe’s collective cultural identity.⁴⁸ This heritage, which traces its roots to Kievan Rus’ and has been shaped by a multitude of influences due to its geographical position ⁴⁸, is currently under direct attack, an assault that underscores its profound importance to Ukrainian national identity.⁴⁹ EU membership would not only facilitate greater cultural exchange and collaboration but also strengthen efforts to preserve and promote this unique heritage. This, in turn, would enrich the EU’s cultural tapestry, fostering deeper intercultural understanding and reinforcing a European identity that celebrates unity in diversity. It would contribute to an EU that is perceived not just as an economic or political alliance, but as a deeply felt “community of cultures.”

B. Demographic Dynamism: Addressing EU’s Aging Population

Ukraine’s large, relatively young, and highly educated population presents a significant demographic asset that can help the European Union address some of its pressing long-term challenges, notably an aging population and a shrinking workforce.⁹ As previously noted, 58% of Ukrainians aged 30-34 hold tertiary education qualifications ⁹, indicating a substantial pool of skilled individuals. The EU is projected to see a significant decline in its working-age population in the coming decades without substantial net migration.⁹

The integration of Ukrainian refugees into EU labor markets under the Temporary Protection Status has already provided a glimpse of this potential, with many Ukrainians quickly finding employment and contributing to host country economies.⁹ Upon accession, the free movement of workers would allow this contribution to be scaled and formalized, helping to fill labor shortages across various sectors and skill levels within the EU.

While the influx of Ukrainian labor offers a clear demographic dividend for the EU, the scale of potential migration post-accession will necessitate careful management and proactive investment in integration infrastructure. This includes ensuring adequate housing, educational facilities, healthcare services, and language training programs in host countries to facilitate smooth integration, prevent undue strain on public services, and ensure positive social outcomes for both migrants and host communities.⁹ Lessons from past enlargements and the current management of Ukrainian refugees under TPS will be invaluable in crafting effective policies. This is not merely about absorbing labor, but about making the necessary investments to unlock the full value of this demographic potential.

Furthermore, the long-term demographic contribution of Ukraine to the EU will be intrinsically linked to the success of Ukraine’s own post-war recovery and reconstruction. Many Ukrainians are currently displaced internally or living as refugees abroad.⁹ Ukraine itself will require a significant portion of its skilled workforce to return and participate in the monumental task of rebuilding the nation.¹⁶ The desire of Ukrainians to return to their homeland is closely tied to the security situation and economic prospects within Ukraine.⁴² Therefore, the EU’s robust support for Ukraine’s reconstruction (as will be discussed in the next section) is not only a matter of solidarity or geopolitical strategy but is also directly connected to ensuring that Ukraine remains a viable, thriving nation. A successfully reconstructed Ukraine will be a source of demographic dynamism for the entire continent, allowing its citizens to contribute both to their homeland’s prosperity and, through well-managed labor mobility, to the broader European economy. Conversely, a failed reconstruction could lead to further, potentially destabilizing, outward migration rather than a managed and mutually beneficial demographic enhancement for the EU.

V. Navigating the Path Forward: Realizing Mutual Benefits through Reform and Reconstruction

A. The Symbiotic Relationship between Ukraine’s Reforms and EU Accession

The realization of Ukraine’s full potential value to the European Union is intrinsically linked to two parallel processes: successful post-war reconstruction and sustained institutional reforms. The financial scale of reconstruction is immense, with estimates placing the cost at approximately €506 billion (or $524 billion) over the next decade.²¹ Simultaneously, Ukraine must continue its trajectory of deep institutional reforms, particularly in critical areas such as combating corruption and strengthening the rule of law, judiciary, and public administration.⁶ These reforms are not merely prerequisites for membership but are fundamental to building a resilient, transparent, and prosperous Ukrainian state capable of fully integrating into and contributing to the EU.

The EU accession process itself serves as a powerful anchor and catalyst for these necessary reforms.⁴ The rigorous framework of the

acquis communautaire provides a clear roadmap, and the prospect of membership offers strong incentives for political elites and society to undertake often difficult changes. The EU’s leverage, through conditionality and technical assistance, should be astutely employed to foster robust institutional development and ensure that reforms are not only adopted but also effectively implemented and sustained.¹⁹ Despite the extraordinary challenges posed by wartime conditions, Ukraine has demonstrated a commitment to this reform agenda, making notable progress in strengthening its anti-corruption framework and advancing judicial reforms.⁴ For instance, Ukraine’s score in the 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index improved, reaching 36 out of 100, one of the most significant global improvements that year.⁵¹

B. EU’s Role in Supporting Transformation and the Need for EU Internal Adaptation

The European Union has a crucial role to play in supporting Ukraine’s transformation. This support is multifaceted, encompassing substantial financial assistance, such as the €50 billion Ukraine Facility ⁴ and the Ukraine Investment Framework designed to mobilize private sector investment ²¹, as well as extensive technical expertise and capacity-building initiatives. This collaborative effort is essential for enabling Ukraine to navigate the complexities of reconstruction and meet the demanding requirements of EU accession.

Concurrently, Ukraine’s accession journey necessitates a degree of internal adaptation within the EU itself. Integrating a country of Ukraine’s size, economic profile, and geopolitical significance will inevitably require adjustments to the EU’s budgetary frameworks, decision-making processes (potentially including broader application of Qualified Majority Voting), and key policies such as the Common Agricultural Policy and Cohesion Policy.² These internal reforms are vital to ensure that an enlarged Union remains functional, efficient, and capable of decisive action.

The sheer scale of Ukraine’s reconstruction offers a historic opportunity for the EU to pioneer a new, more effective model of post-conflict recovery assistance. This model can be deeply integrated with accession conditionality, ensuring that financial and technical support is strategically tied to tangible progress in key reform areas. By linking aid directly to milestones in strengthening the rule of law, combating corruption, and enhancing governance, the EU can create a powerful incentive structure. This approach would ensure that assistance contributes not only to rebuilding physical infrastructure but also, crucially, to building a resilient, transparent, and EU-aligned state. Such a model, forged in the Ukrainian context, could serve as a valuable template for future EU engagement in post-conflict zones or with other candidate countries facing significant institutional challenges.

Furthermore, the “defensive enlargement” ³ driven by Ukraine’s candidacy is compelling the EU to confront and potentially resolve long-standing internal debates about its strategic direction, institutional efficiency, and the delicate balance between deepening existing integration and widening its membership. Ukraine’s size and its profound geopolitical implications present a significant absorption challenge that cannot be ignored.² This reality forces urgent discussions on internal EU reforms, including decision-making mechanisms like QMV and budgetary allocations ²—issues the EU has often found difficult to address decisively in the past. Ukraine’s accession, therefore, can act as an external catalyst that compels necessary internal adaptation. This could lead to a more streamlined, strategically coherent, and capable European Union, better equipped to act decisively in a complex and often volatile global landscape. The alternative, as some analyses warn, is the risk of increased institutional dysfunction within an unprepared, enlarged Union.³

VI. Conclusion: A Stronger, More Resilient, and Geopolitically Assertive EU with Ukraine

A. Recapitulation of Multifaceted Value

Ukraine’s accession to the European Union promises to be a transformative event, bringing a wealth of strategic assets and dynamic potential to the bloc. Economically, Ukraine offers a vast agricultural heartland capable of bolstering EU food security and global market leadership; a highly skilled and innovative human capital base, particularly in the burgeoning IT sector, ready to fuel the EU’s digital future; substantial reserves of critical raw materials essential for the green and digital transitions; and significant energy infrastructure, including gas storage and renewable potential, that can enhance the EU’s energy resilience. In the security and geopolitical domain, Ukraine contributes a battle-hardened military with unparalleled experience in modern warfare, a rapidly innovating defense industry, invaluable intelligence on regional threats, and a strategic geographical position that will decisively reinforce the EU’s eastern flank and its overall capacity to project stability. Socio-culturally, Ukraine brings a population deeply committed to European values, whose resilience and democratic aspirations can reinvigorate the European project, alongside a rich cultural heritage that will further diversify the Union’s identity and a demographic dynamism that can help address the EU’s aging workforce.

B. The Transformative Potential for the EU

The integration of Ukraine is far more than an act of solidarity or a response to geopolitical pressure; it is a profound opportunity for the European Union to redefine its own future. Ukraine’s membership is not merely about what Ukraine stands to gain, but fundamentally about what the EU can become: a more strategically autonomous entity, capable of shaping its security environment; an economically more competitive and resilient global actor, with diversified supply chains and new growth engines; and a political union with a renewed sense of purpose and a stronger voice on the world stage.

While the path to full integration is undeniably fraught with challenges—chief among them the colossal task of post-war reconstruction and the imperative of sustained institutional reform within Ukraine—the long-term strategic benefits for a more integrated, influential, and secure European Union are compelling and far-reaching. The accession of Ukraine has the potential to be a defining moment for the 21st-century European project, reinforcing its core values, expanding its reach, and augmenting its capacity to ensure a stable, democratic, and prosperous continent.

The successful integration of Ukraine will stand as a powerful testament to the EU’s enduring power of attraction and its remarkable capacity for strategic adaptation in the face of profound geopolitical shifts. Russia’s war was a direct challenge to the EU’s values, its security, and its very model of peaceful integration.² By embracing Ukraine, a large nation that has fought valiantly for its European choice, the EU demonstrates its resolve, its resilience, and its ability to act decisively as a geopolitical player. This, in turn, will significantly bolster its credibility and influence on the world stage, affirming its role in shaping a rules-based international order.

Furthermore, the shared journey of Ukraine’s accession is likely to foster a deeper and more tangible sense of European identity and common purpose, not only within Ukraine itself but also among the existing EU member states. The Ukrainian struggle has resonated deeply across Europe, evoking widespread solidarity.⁴² The complex process of integrating Ukraine will demand unprecedented unity, shared effort, and mutual compromise from all parties involved. Navigating these challenges and seizing the attendant opportunities together can strengthen the bonds between member states, reinforcing a collective European identity that is rooted in shared values, common interests, and a unified destiny. This shared endeavor can make the European Union more than just a sum of its parts, but a truly cohesive community capable of meeting the great challenges of our time.

C. Final Thought

The accession of Ukraine to the European Union represents a strategic investment in a shared future. It is an undertaking that, while demanding, promises to yield a stronger, more resilient, and geopolitically assertive European Union, better equipped to navigate the complexities of the 21st century and to champion peace, democracy, and prosperity across the European continent and beyond.⁶

Works cited

1. Policy Brief | Impacts of Ukraine’s accession on the EU and its member states, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.europeum.org/en/articles-and-publications/policy-brief-impacts-of-ukraines-accession-on-the-eu-and-its-member-states/
2. Ukraine’s Bombed Way to EU Membership | Columbia | Journal of …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/content/ukraines-bombed-way-eu-membership
3. Ukraine means enlargement is again the EU’s priority – but not for the reasons it claims, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2024/02/ukraine-means-enlargement-again-eus-priority-not-reasons-it-claims
4. Commission adopts 2024 Enlargement Package – EEAS – European Union, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/delegations/ukraine/commission-adopts-2024-enlargement-package_en
5. Ukraine – European Commission – Enlargement and Eastern Neighbourhood, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/european-neighbourhood-policy/countries-region/ukraine_en
6. Enlargement to Ukraine: EU must confront the challenges, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://theloop.ecpr.eu/the-eu-must-confront-the-challenges-of-enlargement-to-ukraine/
7. eu enlargement is a strategic necessity for the united states, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://theloop.ecpr.eu/why-eu-enlargement-is-a-strategic-necessity-for-the-united-states/
8. Fast-tracking Ukraine’s EU accession helps no one — least of all Ukraine – Politico.eu, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.politico.eu/article/ukraine-eu-fast-track-donald-trump-kyiv/
9. Dispelling Myths: The Social and Economic Implications of Ukraine’s …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://sceeus.se/en/publications/dispelling-myths-the-social-and-economic-implications-of-ukraines-membership-of-the-european-union/
10. Cost-benefit analysis: opportunities for the EU from Ukraine’s accession – Prism Ua, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://prismua.org/en/english-cost-benefit-analysis-opportunities-for-the-eu-from-ukraines-accession/
11. Case Study Details – GovTech Intelligence Hub – Ukraine’s Digital …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.govtechintelhub.org/case-study-details/ukraine’s-digital-transformation-as-europe’s-digital-opportunity/aJYTG0000000ZXF4A2
12. Ukraine’s IT Powerhouse 2024: From Resilience to Global Reach, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://digitalstate.gov.ua/news/it-outsourcing/ukraines-it-powerhouse-2024-from-resilience-to-global-reach
13. The Impact of Ukraine’s Accession on the EU’s Economy – CEPS, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/the-impact-of-ukraines-accession-on-the-eus-economy/
14. Ukraine’s entry into the EU is not just a benefit for Kyiv – Eunews, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.eunews.it/en/2024/03/07/ukraines-entry-into-the-eu-would-not-only-benefit-kyiv/
15. Ukraine’s EU accession: digital transformation and media legislation screening meeting, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://eufordigital.eu/ukraines-eu-accession-digital-transformation-and-media-legislation-screening-meeting/
16. Ukraine’s fight for its people | Impact of human capital flight on Ukraine’s economy and demographics – Chatham House, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.chathamhouse.org/2025/02/ukraines-fight-its-people/impact-human-capital-flight-ukraines-economy-and-demographics
17. Human Capital in Ukraine’s IT Sector: Analysis of the Current State, Statistics, And Development Prospects – ResearchGate, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392259134_Human_Capital_in_Ukraine’s_IT_Sector_Analysis_of_the_Current_State_Statistics_And_Development_Prospects
18. Values based partnership: Why the EU needs to accelerate trade with Ukraine – Politico.eu, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.politico.eu/sponsored-content/values-based-partnership-why-the-eu-needs-to-accelerate-trade-with-ukraine/
19. Author: / Content Type: Policy Brief / Publishing Institution: Bruegel / Political Geography: Ukraine / Topic: European Union – CIAO Search Results, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://ciaonet.org/catalog.html?f%5Bauthor%5D%5B%5D=&f%5Bcontent_type%5D%5B%5D=Policy+Brief&f%5Binstitution%5D%5B%5D=Bruegel&f%5Blocation%5D%5B%5D=Ukraine&f%5Btopic%5D%5B%5D=European+Union&per_page=10&search_field=all_fields&searched=yes&sort=relevance
20. Content Type: Special Report / Publishing Institution: Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) / Publication Year: within 25 Years / Topic: Regional Integration – CIAO Search Results, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://ciaonet.org/catalog?f%5Bcontent_type%5D%5B%5D=Special+Report&f%5Binstitution%5D%5B%5D=Centre+for+European+Policy+Studies+%28CEPS%29&f%5Bpub_date%5D%5B%5D=years_25&f%5Btopic%5D%5B%5D=Regional+Integration&per_page=100&search_field=all_fields&searched=yes&sort=relevance
21. Updated Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Needs Assessment …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/02/25/updated-ukraine-recovery-and-reconstruction-needs-assessment-released
22. Forth Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment in Ukraine: total cost of reconstruction and recovery estimated at €506 billion – EU NEIGHBOURS east, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://euneighbourseast.eu/news/latest-news/forth-rapid-damage-and-needs-assessment-in-ukraine-total-cost-of-reconstruction-and-recovery-estimated-at-e506-billion/
23. The future of rare earths mining in Ukraine – European Parliament, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2025/765789/EPRS_ATA(2025)765789_EN.pdf
24. Ukraine: critical materials, a strategic challenge for Europe – A la Une – REGARD SUR L’EST, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://regard-est.com/ukraine-critical-materials-a-strategic-challenge-for-europe
25. Mapped: Ukraine’s Mineral Resources – Elements by Visual Capitalist, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://elements.visualcapitalist.com/mapped-ukraines-mineral-resources/
26. Ukraine Could Play a Key Role in EU’s Supply of Raw Materials | Press release – ifo Institut, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.ifo.de/en/press-release/2025-04-23/ukraine-could-play-key-role-in-eu-supply-of-raw-materials
27. Ukraine Has One of the Largest Gas Storage Capacities, A Key …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://united24media.com/business/ukraine-has-one-of-the-largest-gas-storage-capacities-a-key-resource-for-europe-5645
28. EU eyes Ukrainian storage fix to Slovakia gas spat – Politico.eu, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-eyes-ukrainian-storage-fix-to-slovakia-gas-spat/
29. Market design – Ukraine energy profile – Analysis – IEA, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.iea.org/reports/ukraine-energy-profile/market-design
30. Ukraine’s energy sector | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/power-and-energy/ukraines-energy-sector
31. Support for Ukraine’s resilience – European Commission, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://commission.europa.eu/topics/eu-solidarity-ukraine/eu-assistance-ukraine/support-ukraines-resilience_en
32. EU, Germany boost Ukraine’s energy efficiency fund with 18 million euros – The Kyiv Independent, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://kyivindependent.com/eu-and-germany-boost-ukraines-energy-efficiency-fund-with-18-million-euros/
33. Can Ukraine become Europe’s green energy hub while expanding its nuclear capacity?, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://theloop.ecpr.eu/can-ukraine-become-europes-green-energy-hub/
34. Why Ukraine Must Be at the Core of the New European Security Architecture – ICDS, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://icds.ee/en/why-ukraine-must-be-at-the-core-of-the-new-european-security-architecture/
35. Ukraine’s drone attack on Russian air bases is a lesson for the West on its vulnerabilities, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-drone-attack-hybrid-warfare-033b53dc244c57d037100e990ff91c5e
36. Ukraine’s Battlefield Drone Innovations are Influencing Europe’s …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://smallwarsjournal.com/2025/06/11/ukraines-battlefield-drone-innovations/
37. European Defence & Security Summit 2025 Programme, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://ebsummits.eu/our-summits/european-defence-security/2025/programme/
38. Replacing foreign aid: A macroeconomic plan B for Ukraine (and Europe) – CEPR, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/replacing-foreign-aid-macroeconomic-plan-b-ukraine-and-europe
39. Staying power: Securing peace in Ukraine while balancing European interests | ECFR, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://ecfr.eu/article/ukraine-at-a-crossroads-securing-peace-while-balancing-european-interests/
40. The Key to Ukraine’s Future Lies in Europe | Carnegie Endowment …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://carnegieendowment.org/russia-eurasia/politika/2025/05/ukraine-eu-future?lang=en
41. Why EU Enlargement Is a Strategic Necessity for the United States …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.cnas.org/publications/commentary/why-eu-enlargement-is-a-strategic-necessity-for-the-united-states
42. Most Ukrainians now identify as Europeans: Reshaping identity in …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://migrationpolicycentre.eu/most-ukrainians-now-identify-as-europeans-reshaping-identity-in-times-of-war/
43. Full article: Ukrainian values: between the Slavic-Orthodox legacy and Europe’s allure, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14616696.2023.2206901
44. Researcher from Ukraine studies and displays resilience | Penn …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.psu.edu/news/health-and-human-development/story/researcher-ukraine-studies-and-displays-resilience
45. Beyond the battlefield: the unwavering resilience of Ukrainian society, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.eurac.edu/en/blogs/connecting-the-dots/beyond-the-battlefield-the-unwavering-resilience-of-ukrainian-society
46. Post-War Ukraine: Healing a Traumatized Nation – ReliefWeb, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://reliefweb.int/report/ukraine/post-war-ukraine-healing-traumatized-nation
47. Ukrainians Are Designing The Future Of Post-War Reconstruction – Noema Magazine, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.noemamag.com/ukrainians-are-designing-the-future-of-post-war-reconstruction/
48. History of Ukrainian nationality – Wikipedia, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Ukrainian_nationality
49. The impact of war on Ukraine’s cultural heritage: NEMO – Network of …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.ne-mo.org/news-events/article/the-impact-of-war-on-ukraines-cultural-heritage/
50. Defending Democracy: Ukraine’s EU Path amid War and Reform …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://europeandemocracyhub.epd.eu/defending-democracy-ukraines-eu-path-amid-war-and-reform/
51. (PDF) Integration Challenges of Ukrainian Anti-Corruption Reform …, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392186436_Integration_Challenges_of_Ukrainian_Anti-Corruption_Reform_on_the_Way_to_EU
52. Ukraine’s post-war recovery: financing, governance and reform strategies, accessed on June 12, 2025, https://neweasterneurope.eu/2025/02/11/ukraines-post-war-recovery-financing-governance-and-reform-strategies/